Argument against Tax Bailouts Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2000 words

Argument against Tax Bailouts - Essay ExampleAdvantages to be discussed ar bailouts atomic number 18 needed to ensure that largish corporations whose collapse will touch several(prenominal) industries can survive bailouts atomic number 18 a necessary economic stimulating to leap out the shaky economy Bailouts are essentially giving medication loans which the corporation receiving must pay back hence, the money will be returned Disadvantages to be discussed are bailouts accustom taxpayer money, which diverts much needed funding from other government programs and institutions bailouts are band-aid solutions as they deal with the symptoms, not the main problems and do not always work bailouts are against the free market principals and promote an environment where big corporations can take reckless risk knowing the government will pull them out. Despite the perceived advantages, tax bailouts are a major cost to tax payers and should not be used as a solution to prevent corporati ons who have set themselves in difficult positions through mismanagement. As of July 24, 2011, the United States government has handed out tax bailouts totaling well over $2.5 trillion with a commitment to give further support of $12.2 trillion (The New York Times). These funds can be directed to improve the governments social services and infrastructure. However, large corporations, who are at the brink bankruptcy due to mismanagement and high risk taking, will end up receiving these funds. However, some would argue that these bailouts are necessity in order to prevent limit the ripple effect from the collapse of big corporation. Bailouts are needed to ensure that big corporations whose collapse will impact several industries can survive. These too big to fail corporations, if they were to collapse the, system would not be able to hold up against such a significant limit in unemployment numbers. Given the cross-functional nature of corporations today, the impact would have been felt in other industries job losses would mean a drop in consumer spending, which would impact the retail industry (as an example) and so on. In order to prevent such a ripple effect, bailouts are necessary. Bailouts are a necessary economic stimulant to jump-start the shaky economy. By implementing a bailout, government can prevent loss of jobs, which means that consumers will continue to have disposable income to spend. This will get on the industries that manufacture the goods and services thus stimulating the economy and keep it steady. Consumers without any source that provides them with disposable income, example jobs, will hold back the spending. This will try lower retail expenditures thus resulting in slow economic growth, which can lead to a recession. Thus, to prevent such dangerous movements, the bailout is required. Bailouts are essentially government loans, which the corporation receiving must pay back hence, the money will be returned. The government has the upper h and in dictating the conditions upon which the bailout is issued. In the case of the automakers, governments, in supervene upon for the bailout, received an ownership stake in the company, for example General Motors, thus will receive dividends and interest once GM starts generating revenue. Part of the deal with the big corporations is that the bailout money has to be returned once the crisis has been averted and